Other Links
Ok.. This is not easy and I do not recommend pursuing a case Pro Se,  but they destroyed my house in 2004 and then my attorneys for the case quit after three years just weeks before trial leaving me without the means to pursue the case. So I scrimped and saved and tried to find other counsel only to finally run out of time and I had to file the case myself in order to preserve my rights.

I don't give up and I do not quit what I start, especially if I have a righteous cause, but I have run out of resources to pursue this case further. The former counsel filed a lien on this new case and stood to get over 40% or more  of any settlement. I fought and argued that they quit the cause and walked away and should have no standing but the judge allowed them in.  I could not find case law for the situation when an attorney quits. If they had died, performed malfeasance or acted against my interests I had case law to support my position that they have no standing in the case, but quitting and breaking a contract the law is mute regarding attorney liens in Oklahoma Law. Yes I could appeal and by stare decisis an opinion could be set, but I just do not have the resources to do that. You take away the more than 40% then the odds of winning sufficient recovery to do the work necessary pretty much fades to zero.  I never wanted to file a suit, I abhor the need that forced me to have to file a suit to recover damages. I'll be damned if someone who quits will profiteer upon my hard work.

The destruction of my home, my heritage,  does not end with the lawsuit. The battle to save my heritage will continue and I'll update this page as the project rolls on.  Welcome to Life...

If you think you need to get involved in a lawsuit my advice is to read Gerry Spence's website.          
 


Legal

OCIS Court action

Original Exhibits (17mb)

Expert deposition

Updates from the opposition (defense)

Defendant's Response to Jan 14 Settlement Offer

Defendant's Final Witness and Exhibits

Application to set hearing 8/18

Unanswered Questions - Letter from opposing counsel
 
Amendment to Motion of Joinder  August 1 , 2008

Second Interrogatory

Preliminary Witness and Exhibit list

First Request Production of Documents
 
First Interrogatories

Defendant's Response June 11, 2008

Entry of Appearance  and Request for Jury Trial
 

 

Previous Counsel Updates

Attorneys' response to plaintiff's motion to reconsider denial of plaintiff's motion for dismissal of attorneys' lien

Motion to Intervene

Attorney Lien

 

My Updates (Plaintiff)

Plaintiff's Offer for Settlement  , Jan 14 2009

Defendant's Witness stipulation not to testify about markings

Defendant's Stipulation on home value date of incident

Scheduling Order

Plaintiff's Final Witness and Exhibits

DENIED - Plaintiff's 2nd Motion for Reconsideration - First struck CIV 18 - Format rules - Font too small

DENIED - Plaintiff's Response to  Amendments to motion for joinder of additional parties

Plaintiff's response to first interrogatories

Statement of Witness Richard Naumann

Preliminary Witness and Exhibits List

DENIED - Objection to motion for joinder of additional parties

DENIED - ESTATE - Objection to motion for joinder of additional parties

DENIED - Motion to Reconsider Ruling

 Intitial Petition - CIVIL RELIEF MORE THAN $10,000.00

Summons to Defendant

REJECTED - Letter of Demand to NPL

REJECTED - Request for a meeting
 


Citations

Barnsdall vs Curnett

Bouldin vs Slick

Martin vs Buckman

 

Original Case link

CJ 2007- 5702 

CJ-2008-3623



Patrick Holley   

PO Box 582        1212 N Garfield
Stillwater OK        Sand Springs  OK
74076                   74063